Videos

Please save and share this playlist!

Press Releases

# PRESS RELEASE

## New Jersey Independent Artist Calls for Artists Affected by DistroKid and Streaming-Platform Distribution Bans to Come Forward

**For Immediate Release**
**August 26, 2026**

### John J. Cannon, also known as John, Jai Beam and Cannon, seeks to connect with artists who have received similar distribution bans or unexplained rejections from DistroKid and major streaming platforms

**RIVER EDGE, NEW JERSEY** — John J. Cannon, an independent producer, engineer, musician and entrepreneur from New Jersey, is calling on musicians and other independent artists who have experienced similar distribution restrictions from DistroKid, Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music and other streaming platforms to come forward and share their experiences.

Cannon, who has been creating music since **1985** and operating his recording and production business **NJ Sound LLC** in River Edge, New Jersey, since 2012, says he was recently informed by DistroKid that stores and streaming services had rejected one or more of his releases and that DistroKid would no longer accept his future releases.

Cannon is seeking to determine whether other independent artists have received substantially similar notices and whether there is a broader pattern involving unexplained removal, rejection or restriction of music distributed through major digital music platforms.

### The DistroKid Notice

Cannon received the following message from DistroKid Support on August 20, 2026:

> "**Man (DistroKid)**
> Aug 20, 2026, 05:50 EDT

>
> Hi,
>
> Hope you are well.
>
> We've been notified by stores and streaming services that one or more of your releases has been rejected due to editorial discretion.
>
> Unfortunately, stores are no longer accepting releases from you via DistroKid. You’ll need to try another distributor for future releases.
> > Please understand that DistroKid is unable to assist with reversing this and many DistroKid features have also been restricted as a result of this. We have no other information or context, and we are unable to get involved or take sides when this occurs.
>
> We’re just the messenger, passing along this info to you in hopes you find it helpful.
>
> We understand that this email is probably frustrating to you, and we regret having to be the messenger of bad news. However, we hope this email is helpful, and we thank you for your understanding.
>
> Best,
>
> Man
> DistroKid Support"


Cannon says the notice raises significant questions because it does not identify the specific release, platform, alleged violation, decision-making criteria, review process or meaningful avenue of appeal.

### A Question of Artistic Freedom and Platform Power

Cannon believes that independent musicians deserve transparency when their ability to distribute their creative work is restricted.

He is particularly concerned about the concentration of power held by major digital music platforms and distributors over an artist's ability to reach the public.

"This isn't simply about one song or one account," Cannon said. "I've been creating music since 1985. I've built a career around music, technology, entrepreneurship and independent production. When an artist is told that major platforms will no longer accept their work, but isn't given a meaningful explanation or opportunity to challenge the decision, it raises serious questions about fairness, transparency and the future of artistic expression."

Cannon intends to investigate whether similar experiences have affected other artists and whether there may be grounds for legal action.

### Important Legal Distinction

Cannon is **not presently asserting that DistroKid, Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music or any other private company has been legally determined to have violated the First Amendment or other civil-rights laws**.

The First Amendment generally restricts government censorship rather than the editorial decisions of private companies. However, Cannon believes that the circumstances surrounding digital distribution decisions warrant investigation, particularly where private platforms collectively control access to enormous portions of the music marketplace.

Among the questions he wants investigated are:

* What specific criteria are being used to reject artists or releases? * Are artists being given adequate notice of the alleged problem? * Are artists provided with meaningful appeal or review procedures? * Are decisions being made consistently across similarly situated artists? * Can an artist effectively challenge an unexplained distribution ban? * What information is shared between distributors and streaming platforms when an artist is restricted? * Are independent artists receiving adequate due process within the contractual and commercial systems that determine whether their work can reach the public? * Are there broader antitrust, consumer-protection, contractual or other legal issues that should be examined?

### Call for Other Artists to Come Forward

Cannon is asking musicians, producers, labels and other independent creators who have received similar notices or experienced unexplained distribution restrictions to contact him.

**Email:** [jaibeam21@gmail.com](mailto:jaibeam21@gmail.com)

**Website:** jaibeam.com

Those contacting Cannon are encouraged to describe what happened, identify the distributor or platform involved, provide the approximate date of the action, and preserve copies of relevant emails, notices, contracts, account restrictions and other documentation.

Cannon hopes to connect affected artists with one another and eventually present the collected experiences to qualified attorneys for evaluation of potential legal claims, including whether a **class action lawsuit or other coordinated legal action** may be appropriate.

### About John J. Cannon

**John J. Cannon**, also known professionally as **John, Jai Beam and Cannon**, is a New Jersey independent producer, recording engineer, musician and entrepreneur. He has been creating music since 1985 and has operated **NJ Sound LLC** in River Edge, New Jersey, since 2012.

Through NJ Sound LLC, Cannon has worked in recording, music production, engineering, live audio, video production and audio post-production. His work reflects decades of involvement in independent music and emerging technology.

Cannon says his goal is not simply to challenge one distribution decision, but to determine whether independent artists have adequate transparency, accountability and meaningful avenues of appeal when powerful digital platforms restrict their ability to publish creative work.

**Media and artist inquiries:**

**John J. Cannon / Jai Beam**

Email: **[jaibeam21@gmail.com](mailto:jaibeam21@gmail.com)**

Web: **jaibeam.com**









Forty Years of Making Music: The Changing Challenges of the Independent Artist

By John J. Cannon

I started making music in 1985.

There was no Spotify. No Apple Music. No streaming. No social media. There certainly wasn’t a way to finish a song in your home studio tonight and potentially have someone halfway around the world listening to it tomorrow.

Being an independent artist was difficult. Recording was expensive. Equipment was expensive. Manufacturing records, tapes and eventually CDs cost money. Distribution was difficult, and getting anyone to actually hear your music could be harder still.

But you generally knew who you were dealing with.

Forty years later, almost everything has changed.

I’ve changed with it.

I’m a musician, producer and recording engineer, and since 2012 I’ve operated NJ Sound LLC in River Edge, New Jersey. I’ve worked in recording, live audio and audio post-production, and I’ve watched the music business reinvent itself more than once.

And I’m still making music.

In many ways, this should be the greatest time in history to be an independent artist.

We can create professional recordings without a major studio. We can collaborate across continents. We can communicate directly with listeners. We can distribute music around the world without first convincing a record-company executive that we deserve to be heard.

That’s extraordinary progress.

But after forty years in this business, I’m discovering that every generation of technology seems to remove some barriers while creating entirely new ones.

A New Kind of Gatekeeper

Recently, I encountered one of those new challenges myself.

On August 20, 2026, I received a notice from my distributor, DistroKid, informing me that one or more of my releases had been rejected by stores and streaming services under what was described as “editorial discretion.” I was also informed that stores would no longer accept releases from me through DistroKid and that I would need to use another distributor for future releases.

Naturally, I wanted to understand what had happened.

Was there something wrong with a release? Had I unknowingly violated a policy? Was there something I could correct? Who made the decision? Was there a way to have someone review it?

When I sought additional information, I was told that DistroKid had no further information or context to provide and could not assist with reversing the decision.

I don’t know everything that went into that decision, and I’m not suggesting that DistroKid or any streaming service acted improperly. I would welcome DistroKid’s perspective and would be happy to update this story with any additional explanation they can provide.

What stayed with me was something larger.

How does an independent artist navigate a music industry in which some of the most important decisions affecting our work may be made inside systems we barely understand?

We Got Rid of Some Gatekeepers. Did We Create New Ones?

When I started, the gatekeepers were obvious.

Record companies. Radio stations. Distributors. Retailers. Club owners. Promoters.

You knew there was someone standing between you and the audience.

Technology was supposed to change that—and to a remarkable extent, it did.

Today an independent musician can write, record, mix, master, release and promote music without ever entering a traditional record-company office.

But between the musician and the listener now sits another enormous infrastructure: digital distributors, streaming platforms, algorithms, automated fraud systems, copyright systems, content policies, recommendation engines and increasingly artificial intelligence.

Most of the time, we barely notice them.

Until something goes wrong.

Then an independent artist can suddenly find himself trying to understand not only what happened, but who made the decision, what rule was applied, and who—if anyone—can explain it.

My recent experience made me realize that after forty years in music, I still have things to learn about being an independent artist.

And I’m probably not the only one.

So I’m Going to Write About It

That’s where this story really begins.

I want to start writing about what it’s actually like to be an independent musician today.

Not just the problems.

The solutions too.

Distribution. Streaming. Royalties. Copyright. Promotion. Algorithms. Artificial intelligence. Recording technology. Live performance. Building an audience. Getting paid. Getting someone to answer an email when something goes wrong.

Some stories will undoubtedly be frustrating.

Others may be success stories that another musician could learn from.

Maybe you’ve had a release unexpectedly rejected or removed.

Maybe you’ve spent months trying to resolve a copyright or royalty problem.

Maybe an algorithm suddenly introduced your music to thousands of people.

Maybe you’ve found a distributor that provides extraordinary support.

Maybe you’ve figured out a promotional strategy that actually works.

Or maybe you’ve been making music for thirty or forty years yourself and you’re wondering how the business you grew up in turned into the one we’re navigating today.

I want to hear those stories.

Independent Artists Helping Independent Artists

I’m not looking to appoint myself the leader of anything.

In fact, if there’s already a community, organization or informal group of independent musicians having these conversations, I’d welcome joining it, contributing what I’ve learned and learning from everyone else.

And if there isn’t one—or if a few musicians simply want to start talking—I’d welcome that too.

The point isn’t who organizes it.

The point is sharing information.

One artist may have already solved the problem another artist is struggling with today. Someone may understand a distribution rule the rest of us don’t. Another musician may have discovered a great service nobody else knows about.

Sometimes the most useful answer may simply be: “That happened to me too. Here’s what I learned.”

That’s the kind of community I’d like to be part of.

I’ve accumulated forty years of stories from this business. I’ll share mine.

I’d like to hear yours.

The good experiences. The bad ones. The strange ones. The successes, mistakes and lessons you wish someone had told you before you learned them yourself.



Because after forty years of making music, there’s one thing that hasn’t changed:

The equipment changes.

The technology changes.

The business changes.

But musicians still need other musicians.

If you’re an independent artist with a story worth sharing, I’d like to hear it.

And if you’ve already built the kind of community I’m describing, I’d like to hear from you too.

John J. Cannon / Jai Beam / John

Musician • Producer • Recording Engineer

NJ Sound LLC

River Edge, New Jersey

Email: jaibeam21@gmail.com

Website: jaibeam.com